Google is reportedly preparing to test new search result changes in the European Union following regulatory pressure under the Digital Markets Act (DMA), according to recent coverage by Search Engine Journal. The move comes after the European Commission raised concerns that certain Google search features may not fully comply with DMA requirements aimed at ensuring fair competition and reducing self-preferencing by designated “gatekeeper” platforms.
These potential changes could significantly alter how search results appear across EU member states. For businesses, publishers, marketplaces, and SEO professionals operating in Europe, the implications extend beyond layout adjustments. They signal an evolving regulatory landscape that could reshape traffic distribution, product visibility, and competitive positioning in organic and vertical search.
Why Google Is Testing Search Changes in the EU
The Digital Markets Act, which officially came into force in 2024, targets large technology platforms classified as gatekeepers. Google falls within this designation due to its dominant position in search and digital advertising.
Build, Promote, and Grow Your Business Online
A great website is just the start. We design high-performance websites and pair them with smart digital marketing strategies to drive traffic, generate leads, and grow your business consistently.
Get A Free Consultation
Under the DMA, gatekeepers must:
- Avoid unfair self-preferencing
- Ensure interoperability and data access fairness
- Provide equal treatment to third-party services
- Maintain transparent ranking practices
Regulators have expressed concerns that Google’s presentation of its own vertical services, such as shopping results, local listings, and travel modules, may disadvantage competing comparison sites and marketplaces.
In response to regulatory scrutiny and potential charges, Google is reportedly preparing new experiments to adjust how certain search features are displayed within the EU.
The Core Issue: Self-Preferencing in Search
Self-preferencing refers to a platform promoting its own services over competitors within its ecosystem.
In the context of search, this could involve:
- Prominent placement of Google Shopping results
- Highlighting Google Flights or Hotels modules
- Elevating local business listings
- Featuring proprietary comparison tools
Regulators argue that such placements may reduce visibility for independent comparison websites and specialized search services.
Google maintains that integrated features improve user experience by offering fast, structured answers.
The tension lies in balancing usability with competitive neutrality.
What Changes Could Look Like
Although final details are not confirmed, potential adjustments may include:
Reduced prominence of Google’s own vertical modules
Increased visibility for third-party comparison services
Alternative layouts that give equal display weight to competitors
Modified ranking signals affecting product or local search
Earlier compliance attempts by Google included adding comparison boxes that linked to competing services. However, critics argued those measures were insufficient.
The new round of testing suggests that regulators expect deeper structural adjustments rather than cosmetic interface tweaks.
Real-World Impact on E-Commerce and Comparison Sites
The stakes are particularly high for comparison shopping engines, travel aggregators, and local service platforms.
For example, in the shopping sector, EU-based price comparison sites have long argued that Google’s Shopping module diverts traffic away from independent platforms.
Following earlier antitrust rulings in 2017, Google modified its shopping display model. However, competition authorities continue to evaluate whether those changes restored genuine fairness.
If new EU tests reduce the dominance of Google’s shopping panels, independent retailers and marketplaces may experience improved organic visibility.
Conversely, advertisers relying heavily on Google’s vertical integrations could see shifts in click-through patterns.
Strategic Implications for SEO Professionals
Search professionals operating in the EU must closely monitor upcoming tests and rollout phases.
Key areas to evaluate include:
Changes in click-through rates for transactional queries
Movement in visibility for comparison keywords
Shifts in structured data impact
Adjustments to featured result placements
Search layouts influence user behavior. Even minor interface changes can alter engagement patterns.
For instance, if third-party review platforms gain more visual prominence, brands may need to strengthen their presence across those platforms in addition to optimizing for Google’s own features.
SEO in the EU may diverge increasingly from search strategy in the United States or other regions.
The Broader Regulatory Context
The DMA represents one of the most comprehensive digital competition frameworks globally.
Its enforcement mechanisms allow regulators to impose significant fines for non-compliance, reaching up to 10% of global annual turnover in some cases.
Given Google’s scale, potential penalties could be substantial.
This regulatory pressure incentivizes meaningful experimentation rather than symbolic compliance.
Other gatekeepers, including major social platforms and marketplaces, are also adjusting product designs to meet DMA requirements.
The EU’s actions may influence regulatory thinking in other jurisdictions, including the United States and the United Kingdom.
How User Experience Could Change
For everyday users in the EU, changes may not be immediately obvious but could alter how information is surfaced.
Possible outcomes include:
More external comparison links above proprietary modules
Greater diversity in top-ranking commercial results
Less visual dominance of Google-owned features
Users searching for products, hotels, or flights may see a wider mix of providers rather than heavily curated Google modules.
However, usability trade-offs may occur. Google argues that integrated modules streamline decision-making by presenting structured information directly within search results.
Regulators prioritize competition fairness, even if it slightly changes the user interface experience.
Case Study Pattern: Shopping and Travel Search
In past competition cases involving Google Shopping, traffic analysis showed that comparison sites experienced measurable declines after Google introduced enhanced product listing ads and shopping carousels.
Following regulatory intervention, Google implemented auction-based comparison placements. While this technically opened access, critics claimed the system still favored large advertisers.
The current DMA-driven tests may attempt to address those criticisms more comprehensively.
Travel search presents another example. Google Flights and Hotels often appear prominently in commercial queries. Adjustments in these areas could redistribute traffic to independent travel platforms.
Preparing for Volatility in EU Search
Businesses operating in European markets should prepare for short-term volatility as experiments roll out.
Recommended actions include:
Tracking EU-specific performance metrics separately from global data
Monitoring Search Console impressions and CTR trends
Evaluating dependency on Google vertical modules
Diversifying traffic acquisition channels
Companies heavily reliant on Google Shopping placements may need to expand into organic SEO for broader keyword coverage.
Publishers and comparison sites may find new opportunities if layout changes improve exposure.
Long-Term Implications for the Global Search Ecosystem
The DMA is not merely a regional compliance issue. It represents a structural shift in how dominant digital platforms operate within regulated environments.
If Google’s EU search interface diverges significantly from its global version, we may see the emergence of region-specific search strategies.
Additionally, other jurisdictions observing EU enforcement outcomes may adopt similar regulatory approaches.
The balance between platform innovation and competitive fairness remains central.
Google’s planned testing of search changes in response to DMA scrutiny reflects the increasing influence of regulatory frameworks on product design. For digital businesses in the EU, staying informed and agile will be essential as search visibility rules continue evolving under legal oversight.
